Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 2002No. COA01-1559Published

1DissentHunter, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion’s conclusion that defendant’s case was not “final” thereby resulting in the trial court committing error by imposing the firearm enhancement penalty on defendant’s re-sentencing for second-degree kidnapping.

As stated in the majority opinion, “[i]f a judgment is invalid as a matter of law, North Carolina Courts have the authority to vacate the invalid sentence and resentence the defendant accordingly....” State v. Branch, 134 N.C. App. 637, 641, 518 S.E.2d 213, 216 (1999). Here, I agree with the majority’s conclusion that defendant’s separate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BranchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. State v. LesaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API