Legal Opinion

Desh's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 1936No. Appeal, 80PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Kephaet,

Testatrix, Kate Desh, after giving certain specific legacies, left the residue of her estate to be divided share and share alike between her two brothers, Harvey and George Desh. The latter, whose death occurred prior to the execution of the will, was survived by two children. The auditing judge awarded one-half of the residue to Harvey Desh and the other half to the children of George Desh. Harvey Desh appeals on the ground that the court erred in not awarding the entire residue to him.

The question presented is whether the residuary legacy which failed by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gray's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Barnes Foundation v. KeelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Buhl's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Minter's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  5. Citizens Electric Illuminating Co. v. Lackawanna & Wyoming Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McFerren EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Knox's Estate (No. 2)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Null v. StaigerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Toland v. Murphy Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Callery's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API