Legal Opinion

Nesslein v. Nesslein

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 17, 1996No. 95-2687PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Brem Nesslein appeals from a final order of the trial court dismissing her motion for rehearing and/or reconsideration as being untimely served under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530(b) because the envelope which contained opposing counsel’s copy of the motion was postmarked several days after the time for rehearing. We reverse. Ms. Nesslein’s motion was timely served, as was evidenced by the certificate of service on the motion itself. The certificate of service is prima facie proof that service was effectuated on the date sworn to by counsel. Fla. R.Civ.P. 1.080(f). A postal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mr. Martinez of Miami, Inc. v. Ponce De Leon Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Capone v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
  2. Migliore v. MiglioreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Ass'n v. BigleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. Lopez v. Department of RevenueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  5. Fernando Colmenares v. Pablo Dario CastilloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API