Legal Opinion

Peerless Paper Box Mfg. Co. v. Routzahn

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 2, 1927No. 14016PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, District Judge.

A jury was waived by stipulation and the case argued and submitted upon stipulated facts and briefs.

Briefly stated, the pertinent facts are: That the plaintiff in April, 1918, filed its income and profits tax return for the year 1917 in the office of the collector of internal revenue in this district, and thereafter, as required by law, paid the tax in the sum of $17,184.78. It executed a waiver, which was approved and signed January 25, 1923, by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, consenting to a determination, assessment, and collection of taxes duo under the return…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bowers v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Bowers, Collector of Internal Revenue v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co. Same v. Seaman. Same v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Moses v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  3. Routzahn v. Reeves Bros.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  4. Roy & Titcomb, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  5. National Tool Co. v. RoutzahnDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API