Legal Opinion

Jones v. Cashin

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1923No. 23784PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The appellee, an attorney at law, was disbarred as such by an order of the court below, rendered on August 23, 1921, which order was affirmed on appeal to this court in Ex parte Cashin, 128 Miss. 224, 90 So. 850. On January 23, 1923, the appellee filed a petition in the court below-praying that he be reinstated as an, and permitted to practice his profession of, attorney at law. At the February term of the court, the appellants herein were appointed by an order entered on the minutes of the court— “To act as counsellors in and for the said court, to make ansAver to the said petition that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bridges v. Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
  2. State ex rel. Brown v. Poplarville Sawmill Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Ex parte CashinMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Ex parte RedmondMississippi Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Miller v. KeithMississippi Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Mound Bayou v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Beckwith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Marshall v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. Patterson v. AutryMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Craig v. Barber Bros. Contracting Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API