Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tracie L. Flug v. Labor and Industry Review Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2017No. 2015AP001989Published

1Dissent

¶ 44.

PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, C.J.

{dissenting). This review arises from an unpublished decision of the court of appeals1 reversing the circuit court's decision, which affirmed the Labor and Indus*599try Review Commission's (LIRC) order denying Trade Flug (Flug) disability benefits under Wis. Stat. § 102.42(lm).

¶ 45. I condude that Flug, who has sustained a compensable (work-related) injury from which began a continuing course of pain and who underwent surgery upon the advice of her medical doctor to alleviate that pain, is entitled to compensation pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 102.42(lm) if she…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Bruno v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Mulder v. Acme-Cleveland Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API