Tracie L. Flug v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Dissent
¶ 44.
PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, C.J.
{dissenting). This review arises from an unpublished decision of the court of appeals1 reversing the circuit court's decision, which affirmed the Labor and Indus*599try Review Commission's (LIRC) order denying Trade Flug (Flug) disability benefits under Wis. Stat. § 102.42(lm).
¶ 45. I condude that Flug, who has sustained a compensable (work-related) injury from which began a continuing course of pain and who underwent surgery upon the advice of her medical doctor to alleviate that pain, is entitled to compensation pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 102.42(lm) if she…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Bruno v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Mulder v. Acme-Cleveland Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.