Creighton v. Planters & Merchants Bank
Supreme Court of Alabama
Error to the Chancery Court at Mobile. THE facts of this case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
ORMOND, J
The merits of this case were determined when the cause was here at the last term, by the name of *157Creighton et als. v. Paine & Paine, but dismissed, because the appeal was not prosecuted against the proper parties. The only difficulty we now feel is, whether a writ of error will lie to such an order as the present.
The bill was filed by Paine & Paine, to foreclose a mortgage, and at the sale, which was ordered of the mortgaged premises, the Planters and Merchants Bank became the purchaser, and on motion of the Bank, the Chancellor directed a writ of possession to issue. This was an…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Thornton v. Highland Avenue & Belt RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Mansony v. United States BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
- Thompson v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Crabtree v. CliattSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- Thompson v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.