Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Linda Huffman, Individually and as Personal Rep. of the Estate of Jerry Huffman v. Dexter Axle Company & Evans Equipment Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 2013No. 85A02-1207-CT-586Published

1ConcurrenceMay, Judge

I agree we should reverse summary judgment for Dexter for the reasons the majority states: Dexter owed Huffman, its invitee, a duty and there are fact issues as to breach and proximate cause. However, I believe it is unnecessary, and therefore inappropriate, to address OSHA regulations, DOT regulations, the interpretation and application of those regulations, preemption, and congressional intent in this relatively straightforward premises liability case.

As Huffman was an invitee, Dexter owed him a duty to exercise reasonable care for Huffman’s protection while Huffman was on Dexter’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pointon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. McArter v. . RheaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API