In the Matter of the Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, Debtor. Appeal of State of New Jersey
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Dissent
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge,
with whom WEIS, Circuit Judge, joins (dissenting).
I would affirm the order of the district court and reaffirm the action of the panel which first considered this appeal.1 I would hold that the reorganization court had jurisdiction to act and that its order did not constitute an abuse of discretion.
Because my approach differs substantially from that of the majority, it becomes necessary first to outline general contours of the crisis facing our nation’s passenger rail carriers today. I deem such an understanding to be essential to the solution of the problem of this…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brooks-Scanlon Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of La.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Palmer v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Eastern Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.