Legal Opinion

Estate of Ridgely v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 20, 1967No. 55-65PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

This case was referred to Trial Commissioner Herbert N. Maletz with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law. The commissioner has done so in a report and opinion filed on May 10, 1967. Defendant has filed no exceptions to or brief on this report and the time for so filing pursuant to the Rules of the court has expired. On June 1, 1967, plaintiff filed a tentative notice of intention to except to the commissioner’s find*1223ings of fact and proposed conclusions of law in which, it was provided that if the defendant did not file any exceptions the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Sharp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Head v. HargraveSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Estate of Spruill v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  2. Daugherty v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  3. Aagaard v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  4. Estate of Gerard v. CommissionersUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  5. Liflans Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API