Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. McCullen v. Sproles

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1946No. 36238PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcGehee, J.

On November 9, 1935, one Orman Sproles obtained a patent to 160 acres of land located in Pike County, which had been forfeited to the State for nonpayment of taxes. The patent was duly signed by the then Land Commissioner, counter-signed by the Governor, and attested by the Secretary of State. It recites that the purchaser named therein had “complied with all the requirements of the law in such cases made and provided”, and that “in consideration of the premises and the sum of $35, being the amount required to purchase said land”, the same was thereby granted and conveyed to the said patentee.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maxwell Land-Grant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Colorado Coal & Iron Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. State Ex Rel. McCullen v. AdamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Edward Hines Yellow Pine Trustees v. State ex rel. MooreMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Edward Hines Yellow Pine Trustees v. State ex rel. MooreMississippi Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sablan v. CabreraSupreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API