Legal Opinion
United States v. Anthony Richard Kinard
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 20, 2006No. 06-10043, 06-10482PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Per curiam
The appeals of Anthony Richard Kinard and Denny Warren Schmitz were consolidated for oral argument because the appellants’ arrests and convictions arise out of the same incident and both raise the same two issues on appeal. Kinard appeals his conviction and 120-month sentence for conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Schmitz appeals his conviction and 87-month sentence for possession of pseu-doephedrine with intent to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(c)(1).
On appeal, Kinard and Schmitz argue (1) that the district court clearly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Paul Edward HromadaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Javonne WilksCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. AskewCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Carl Greer MacDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. LamonsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Isaac Jerome SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Alexander DimitrovskiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. SausedaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.