Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Century Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 3, 1910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Pollc District Court. — Hon. W. H. McHenry, Judge. Action to cancel certain notes given by plaintiffs to defendant bank, and to secure the return of certain securities deposited by them. Defendants filed motions to strike and for more specific statement, which were sustained, and also filed a counterclaim or cross-petition. From the rulings on the motions-, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, C. J.

Plaintiff Schussler has dismissed his appeal since the case came to this court, and, so far as he is concerned, there is nothing to consider.

Barnes’ appeal is from rulings on a motion to strike parts of his petition and for more specific statements therein. The exact nature of the case need not be considered. Suffice it to say that it is an action to secure the cancellation of certain notes given by plaintiff to the defendant bank, and to secure the return of certain securities' deposited with the bank as collateral to these notes; Defendant filed a motion to strike parts of the original…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. DutcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. State ex rel. Fullerton v. Des Moines City RailwaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Allen v. ChurchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Powers v. County of O'BrienSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  5. Hodgin v. TolerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Century Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  2. Lutz v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Barnes v. Century Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. In Re Estate of DelaneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. Crum v. EmmettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API