Legal Opinion

Uber v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 20, 1991No. CR-90-531PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In three indictments, Martin Jay Uber was charged with the offenses of 1) burglary in the first degree, in violation of § 13A-7-5, Code of Alabama 1975; 2) robbery in the first degree, in violation of § 13A-8-41, Code of Alabama 1975; and 3) theft of property in the first degree, in violation of §13A-8-3, Code of Alabama 1975. The three cases were tried together, and the jury found Uber guilty of the three offenses as charged in the indictments. The court sentenced Uber as a habitual offender to three concurrent sentences of 25 years each in the state penitentiary.

The evidence at trial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Ex Parte BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Bush v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  5. United States v. George Leo Barfield, United States of America v. William James Rybka, United States of America v. William Donny HalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sockwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  3. Lowe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. R.J. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API