Legal Opinion

Booth v. Wheat

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 1948No. 6355PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice.

This is a suit instituted by appellants to annul the will of W. O. Richey, deceased, because it violates the rule against per-petuities. Trial on'contest in the county Court of Lamar County resulted in judgment admitting the will to probate. Appellants perfected their appeal to the District Court of Lamar County and upon trial in that court on an agreed statement of facts judgment was rendered annulling the provisions of the will violating the rule against perpetuities and holding valid all other provisions.

It is the contention of appellants as expressed in their second…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. MenefeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Landram v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Hunt v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Brizendine v. American Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Tramell v. TramellTennessee Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sellers v. PowersTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Bradshaw v. ParkmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API