Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Case Western Reserve University v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1999No. 97-2118Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLundberg Stratton, J.

I agree with the majority’s holding with two exceptions. I believe that the parking garage and the below-market-cost office space made available to start-up technology-based companies should be exempt from taxation.

Office Space Provided by the Incubator Program

The majority reverses the BTA’s decision to exempt the office space. The majority reasons that the incubator tenants do not use the office space for a charitable purpose and therefore the office space is not tax-exempt. I believe a more reasonable interpretation of R.C. 5709.121(A) requires examination of EDI’s use of the office space…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Canton v. Imperial Bowling Lanes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Cincinnati Nature Center Ass'n v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bowers v. Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. American Chemical Society v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Mays v. EngleOhio Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API