MacNeal v. I.C.O.A., Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
This is an appeal following the trial court’s certification that a substantial issue of jurisdiction exists pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 311(b)(2). We affirm the trial court’s order dismissing appellants’ preliminary objections.
The procedural history of this appeal follows. Appellees are shareholders of I.C.O.A. In April of 1987, appellees brought an action against I.C.O.A., a Nevada corporation *432conducting business in Pennsylvania and Illinois, and Gerald Brodsky, the former president of I.C.O.A., requesting the court to compel I.C.O.A. to permit the appellees to inspect its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Callery v. Blythe Township Municipal AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Zerbe Township School District v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Witney v. Lebanon CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Del Turco v. Peoples Home Savings Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Patton v. Republic Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fetterman v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Lachappelle v. Interocean Management Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Fetterman v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Stull, B. v. Armstrong Gas CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016