Legal Opinion

Amankwaa v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 19, 2018No. 17-36Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-36V (Filed: June 4, 2018) (Reissued for Publication: June 19, 2018) 1 *************************************** DAWN E. AMANKWAA and BENJAMIN * S. EDWARDS, parents and natural guardians * of BMA, a minor, * * Petitioners, * Vaccine Act; Attorneys’ Fees; Reasonable * Basis for Petitioners’ Claim; Impending v. * Statutory Limitations Deadline; Simmons * SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN * SERVICES, * * Respondent. * *************************************** Robert J. Krakow, New York, NY, for petitioners. Voris E. Johnson, Jr., United States…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nathaniel Saxton, by and Through His Legal Representatives, Steven and Candace Saxton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  2. Lisa Munn, Personal Representative of the Estate of Chelsea Vukelich v. The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  3. Rodriguez Ex Rel. Estate of Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  4. Henry Hendler, Paul Garrett, Tillie Goldring, as Trustees, and Henry Hendler and Irving Gronsky v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  5. Chuisano v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API