Valley Credit Service, Inc. v. Mair
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
The issue in this appeal is whether defendant may raise as a defense in an action to collect a hospital bill the hospital’s responsibility to comply with requirements of 42 USC § 291 et seq (1970), commonly known as the Hill-Burton Act. The Act requires hospitals receiving federal funds to provide "a reasonable volume of services to persons unable to pay therefor.” 42 USC § 291c(e)(2) (1970); 42 CFR § 53.111(1976). Defendant alleged she is unable to pay for the services and raised the hospital’s failure to comply as an affirmative defense. Plaintiff’s 1 demurrer to that defense was sustained.
F…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cook v. Ochsner Foundation HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
- Corum v. Beth Israel Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Yale-New Haven Hospital v. MatthewsConnecticut Superior Court · 1974
- Carter v. RickerOregon Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hospital Center at Orange v. CookNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Cooper Medical Center v. JoynerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- St. Michael Hospital of Franciscan Sisters v. County of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- Creditor's Service, Inc. v. ShafferColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
- Dark v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.