Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Bosworth

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 5, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Petition for an order of court requiring the respondent to pay over certain moneys received by him as attorney.

1Opinion of the CourtDureee, C. J.

The facts stated in the petition for our action are as follows : The petitioner and two minors for whom she is guardian are plaintiffs in an ejectment suit pending in this court, wherein Nathan M. Bunn is nominally defendant, but which is in fact defended by one Samuel J. Allyn, for himself and wife, the parties really interested. A settlement of the suit was recently agreed upon, by the terms of which the suit was to be discontinued without costs, upon conveyance to Allyn’s wife of the interest of the minor plaintiffs in the land in suit, leave to make the conveyance being obtained, by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex parte StattsNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  2. Grant's CaseNew York Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Wilmerdings v. FowlerNew York Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilkerson v. OlcottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  2. Ideal Tile Corp. v. N.T. Investment Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  3. In the Matter of Keven A. McKennaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2015
  4. In the Matter of Keven A. McKennaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API