Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 1932No. 15333PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CALHOUN, Judge.

The offense, possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; the punishment, 18 months in the penitentiary.

The state’s attorney before this court moves to strike out the statement of facts because not approved by the trial judge. It is made to appear by a statement of the trial judge that the original statement of facts was prepared within the 90 days allowed by law and the original question and answer statement of facts was presented to him for his approval, and he approved the same and intended to sign it but due to some oversight on his part failed to sign it after…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hinton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Maddox, Alias Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Strickel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Phillipps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Turman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Ex Parte DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API