Legal Opinion
Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-MaatsChappij
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 19, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, District Judge.
This is a motion by plaintiff, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 12 (b), 28 U.S.C.A., for an order striking out the answer of the third-party defendant (Chemical Bank & Trust Company) to plaintiff’s third amended complaint and dismissing the counterclaim set forth therein on the grounds that, as the third amended complaint and the answer and counterclaim do not involve a federal question and the plaintiff and the third-party defendant are both citizens of the same State (New York), this court lacks jurisdiction over the person of the plaintiff with…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sheppard v. Atlantic States Gas Co. of Pennsylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Bernstein v. N. v. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart - MaatschappijCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
3Cited by4 opinions
- Revere Copper and Brass Incorporated v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, and Third-Party v. George A. Fuller Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Heintz & Co. v. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Union Bank & Trust Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1965
- American Bowling Supply Co. v. Al Martin, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1951