McKay v. Barrick
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
Morling, J. —
Appellants move to strike from the record appellee’s abstract and denial. Appellee by this abstract and denial denies the correctness 'of defendánts’ abstract of the testimony of the two defendants, and makes substitutioii therefor. The substituted testiinony is set out at unnecessary length, but it omits part thereof shown in appellants' abstract. Appellants have not filed denial, nor have they caused to be certified to this court the record of the testimony in question. A transcript has been filed, but not of this testimony. The motion is overruled. ;
On the merits, the question…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dickson v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Harvey v. KirtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Bitzer v. WashburnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Lambert v. Reisman Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Morton v. WoodsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shannon v. GaarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Relph v. GoltrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1932