People v. Kenley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
A defendant is not entitled to a lineup in which the fillers are “nearly identical” to him (People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 336 [1990], cert denied 498 US 833 [1990]). However, a lineup is unduly suggestive when only the defendant matches a key aspect of the description of the perpetrator provided by a witness or witnesses (see Foster v California, 394 US 440, 441-443 [1969]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677, 678 [1989]).
Defendant was charged with two robberies that occurred on the same morning. The witnesses to the robberies described the driver of the getaway car, respectively, as “a huge, big,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Foster v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. OwensNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. FingallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015