Wine v. Newcomb, Endicott & Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Des Voignes, J., presiding. Case by Meyer Wine against Newcomb, Endicott & Company for personal injuries to plaintiff’s wife. Case by Leah Wine against Newcomb, ^Endicott & Company for personal injuries. The causes were heard as one. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, C. J.
Testimony for plaintiff (none was offered by defendant except that of a medical man, called, for convenience, out of order) tended to prove that on January 4, 1915, while Leah Wine and her daughter were shopping in defendant’s store and *447were passing along an aisle, or space, set with tables displaying goods, the mother, Leah, fell to the floor, sustaining severe physical injury. The mother, a witness in her own behalf, does not state what caused her to fall, and nothing in her testimony tends to prove negligence of defendant. The daughter accompanying her testified, in substance and effect,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bloomer v. SnellenburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Toland v. Paine Furniture Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Brown v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hulett v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Carpenter v. Herpolsheimer's Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Fort Dodge Hotel Co. of Fort Dodge v. BarteltCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- White v. Herpolsheimer CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.