Lee v. Marsh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 203, Oct. T., 1910, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., Jan. T,, 1909, No. 956, dismissing bill in equity in case of Harry E. Lee and Dorothy M. Lee by Harry E. Lee, her father and next friend, v. L. A. Marsh,'successor to W. E. Borger, principal of the Edgewood public school. Bill in equity for an injunction.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 203, Oct. T., 1910, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., Jan. T,, 1909, No. 956, dismissing bill in equity in case of Harry E. Lee and Dorothy M. Lee by Harry E. Lee, her father and next friend, v. L. A. Marsh,'successor to W. E. Borger, principal of the Edgewood public school. Bill in equity for an injunction. Miller, J., specially presiding, found the facts to be as follows: 1. The plaintiff, Harry E. Lee, is a resident of the borough of Edgewood, this county and state, and is a citizen of Pennsylvania; as such he has a prima facie right to have his…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The decree in this case is affirmed at appellants’ costs on the opinion of the court below dismissing the exceptions to the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the judge specially presiding.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Allen v. IngallsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Commonwealth v. GillenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Abney v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Abney v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Tags on Bedding & Upholstery, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1932