Legal Opinion

Stodder v. Rosen Talking Machine Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 28, 1923PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This case came before the Superior Court on the petition of Frank F. Stodder and Charles Hurwitz that the defendants Eosen Talking Machine Company, Sol M. Sugerman, Ben H. Sugerman and Lillie E. Sugerman be adjudged in contempt of court for failure to obey and comply with the terms of the final decree and injunction entered in the Superior Court, after rescript from the Supreme Judicial Court affirming the final decree previously entered in the Superior Court. The case in the Supreme Judicial Court is reported in 241 Mass. 245.

The final decree, after rescript, ordered, adjudged, and decreed,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stodder v. Rosen Talking Machine Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Ex parte MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Campbell v. TarbellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. v. Commissioner of Department of Mental RetardationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. New England Novelty Co. v. SandbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Clinic & Hospital, Inc. v. McConnellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Town of Lincoln v. GilesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API