Legal Opinion

Samuel v. Mace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 1993No. Appeal No. 1Published

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Under the circumstances of this case, we perceive no impropriety in Supreme Court’s rejection of respondents’ abandonment argument (see, 22 NYCRR 202.48 [a], [b]; Town of Virgil v Ford, 160 AD2d 1073, 1074; Matter of Piper, 145 AD2d 97, 102; cf., Hickson v Gardner, 134 AD2d 930). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Affronti, J. — Preclude Entry of Order.) Present — Green, J. P., Balio, Davis and Doerr, JJ.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hickson v. GardnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Town of Virgil v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. In re PiperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989