Legal Opinion

Holt v. American Woolen Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 1, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

Reported Case. The action is general assumpsit for money had and received, based upon an assignment of wages by one John Ginty, an employee of the defendant Corporation. The case was submitted to an Auditor, whose findings as reported include and disclose the following facts:

*110December 7, 1927, one John Ginty, by written assignment duly recorded, assigned to the plaintiff all wages to be earned by him thereafter until January 1, 1929, while employed as a spinner by the defendant. January 1, 1928, the employee was discharged but again hired in March following under a new contract. May 10, 1928,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mitchell v. WinslowU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1843

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Greenlaw v. RodickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API