Legal Opinion

Harman v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1858PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Noble Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Indictment for passing counterfeit money. Conviction and sentence to the penitentiary.

All the questions arising in the case, except two, are settled by that of Wilkinson v. The State, 10 Ind. R. 372.

The two unsettled questions are these:

1. The counterfeit bill charged in the indictment was passed on Sunday, and hence, it is insisted, that the defendant should have been prosecuted for a violation of the Sabbath, and not for passing counterfeit money. But we think it was proper to indict the defendant for the commission of the higher crime, and should he subsequently be prose*312cuted for violating…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tindall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Pivak v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Fletcher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Sohn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API