Jonathan Hedgpeth v. Ammar Rahim
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Srinivasan, Circuit Judge:
Jonathan Hedgpeth brought a civil suit against two police officers, alleging that they violated his Fourth Amendment rights by arresting him without probable cause and using excessive force to subdue him. The officers moved for summary judgment, arguing that they were protected by qualified immunity from Hedgpeth's *805 claims. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the officers, and we affirm.
I
For purposes of reviewing the court's grant of summary judgment against Hedgpeth, we view the facts giving rise to his arrest in the light most favorable to him.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Timothy Johnson v. Michael RogersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Buehler v. DearCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- Jackson v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Johnson v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Allen v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.