Culverhouse v. State

Appellant was convicted of tlie offense of violating the prohibition laws by distilling prohibited liquors or having in his possession a still, etc.

It would not be helpful to detail or discuss the evidence. It was circumstantial in its nature but ample to warrant the trial judge in submitting the case to the jury.' Neither the motion for a new trial nor the judgment thereon are included in the bill of exceptions, and hence no question as to the propriety of said judgment is presented to us for decision. Hopkins v. State, 18 Ala. App. 423, 93 So. 40.

There was no error in allowing proof as to…