Sanchez's Administrator v. Hart
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Westcott
This is an action of ejectment. The declaration is in the form prescribed by statute. To the declaration there was a demurrer. The demurrer was sustained. This action is brought by administrators, and the first question presented' by the record is, can an administrator maintain ejectment in this State? It must be admitted that at the common law, except as to lands held for a term of years by the intestate, the general rule was that he could not maintain ejectment; and such, we think, from a rather extended examination, is the rule in most of the States of the Union. It is admitted, however,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Streeter v. PatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
- Hersey v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
- Golding v. Golding's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Union Bank v. Heirs & Terretenants of PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1850
- Campau v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Doyle v. WadeSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
- Bush v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
- Deans v. WilcoxonSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
- Whitlock v. WillardSupreme Court of Florida · 1881
- Rivas v. SummersSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.