Legal Opinion
Boynton v. Boynton
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 7, 1929PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
This is a petition for instructions as to the meaning of certain portions of the will of Everett E. Tarbell. The petitioner is the sole remaining executrix of the will. The respondents are Bertha F. Boynton in her individual capacity as the daughter of the testator, and said Bertha F. Boynton as administratrix of the testator’s widow; Beatrice Wallace Duffey, the testator’s grandniece; and Adelaide L. Tarbell, administratrix of the testator’s son, Rudolph E. Tarbell.
The will was executed February 23, 1911. The testator’s wife, Lizzie D. Tarbell, was then living, as well as were his two…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Brandenburg v. ThorndikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Best v. BerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Bassett v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Loring v. CoolidgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Jones v. GaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Fitts v. PowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Boynton v. TarbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Kimbrough v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Kruger v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.