Essex Co. v. Goldman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtKirk, J.
The plaintiff, the Essex Company, brought this bill in the Land Court for declaratory relief under G. L. c. 231A. It requested a declaration that the several defendants were obligated to pay certain rent. The defendant Paul Realty, Inc. (Paul Realty) appeals from a final decree in favor of the plaintiff.
The plaintiff was incorporated pursuant to St. 1845, c. 163, to construct a dam, locks and canals across the Merrimack River, and to create water power and use it, or lease or sell it to others, for manufacturing and mechanical purposes. The Essex Company constructed a dam and two canals, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Willets v. LanghaarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Malloy v. CarrollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- McCarthy v. LaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Nissenberg v. FellemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Whittenton Manufacturing Co. v. StaplesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Paul Peter Pasterczyk v. Michael v. FairCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Ritter v. BergmannMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Gardner v. BerkmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Krapf v. KrapfMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Essex Co. v. Atlantic Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.