Legal Opinion

Rose v. Lelande

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1912No. Civ. No. 1260PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPLICATION for Writ of Mandate to the County Clerk of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an ex parte application for an alternative writ of mandate directed to H. J. Lelande, county clerk and ex officio clerk of the superior court of Los Angeles County, commanding him to enter the default of defendants in a certain action pending in said superior court, wherein petitioner is plaintiff and Adna R. Chaffee, sued as a member of the board of public works of the city of Los Angeles, and his official surety, alleged to be a corporation, are defendants, or show cause for his failure so to do.

The petition shows that defendants, within due time, filed their answer to the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Isbell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Potts v. WhitsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. W. A. Rose Co. v. Municipal Court for Oakland-Piedmont Judicial DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Baske v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Goddard v. PollockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API