Legal Opinion

Allegheny County v. Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1924No. Appeal, 49PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

Assuming for the purposes of this case that the City of Pittsburgh is a poor district (Straub v. City of Pittsburgh, 138 Pa. 356), is it liable to the County of Allegheny, of which it forms a part, for the amounts expended by the latter for the maintenance of neglected and dependent children found in that city and committed by the juvenile court of the county? The trial judge, sitting without a jury, held the city not liable. The county has appealed.

For its right to recover, the county relies on the proviso clause in the Act of May 8, 1913, P. L. 177. The act…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. Overseers of the Poor v. Overseers of the PoorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  3. Straub v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  4. Overseers of Washington v. Overseers of BeaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
  5. Wolf's CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moscow Borough Poor District's AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Remensnyder v. RemensnyderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. In Re: Joseph and Dorothy SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Scott Township Poor District's AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API