Legal Opinion

TABET LUMBER COMPANY, INC. v. Golightly

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1969No. 8519PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOBLE, Chief Justice.

In Castillo v. Tabet Lumber Co., 75 N.M. 492, 406 P.2d 361, we held that Luz Castillo had a prescriptive right-of-way easement to and from her property over a roadway across the land involved in this action. Following that decision, Tabet Lumber Company, Inc., plaintiff and appellant (hereafter referred to as Tabet), purchaser of the land involved in this action, brought suit against Pearl Golightly, Tabet’s grantor, defendant and appellee (hereafter referred to as Golightly) to recover damages for breach of a covenant against encumbrances.

Golightly conveyed the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Huyck v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Memmert v. McKeenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  3. Ford v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Williams v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Evans v. FaughtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bloom v. HendricksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Bloom v. HendricksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  3. AAA Valley Gravel, Inc. v. TotaroAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. AAA Valley Gravel, Inc. v. TotaroAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. TABET LUMBER COMPANY, INC. v. GolightlyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API