Legal Opinion

Sukup Manufacturing v. Rushing

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided June 11, 2009No. Civil Action 4:07CV163TSL-LRAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

TOM S. LEE, District Judge.

This cause is before the court on the motion of defendant Jimmy Rushing for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Sukup Manufacturing (Sukup) has responded in opposition to the motion and the court, having considered the memoranda of authorities, together with attachments, submitted by the parties, concludes that there are genuine issues of material fact which preclude summary judgment.

Defendant Deborah Rushing d/b/a Grain Systems Repair (Deborah Rushing) is in the business of soliciting…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Adams v. Petrade International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  2. PMZ Oil Co. v. LucroyMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bowers Window & Door Co. v. DearmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Koval v. KovalMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Sanders v. DantzlerMississippi Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API