Manchester and Hull v. . Herrington
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] I am unable to discover any plausible reason for contending that the section of the Revised Statutes upon which this action is founded was repealed or suspended by the act of 1845. Section 9 of the latter act repeals all laws conflicting with its provisions. The only section of this act with which it can be claimed that the section of the Revised Statutes in question in any way conflicts is the 5th, which declares that whenever any town shall determine, pursuant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nichols v. ChapmanNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- Griswold v. StewartNew York Supreme Court · 1825
- Colegrove v. BreedNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Bennett v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1824
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hegewisch v. . SilverNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Sullivan v. WoodsArizona Supreme Court · 1897
- Dickinson v. OliverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Board of Excise of Ont. Co. v. . GarlinghouseNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Bellinger v. BirgeNew York Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.