Legal Opinion

Ohio Security Insurance Company v. Keith Pryer et al

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 2026No. 2:24-cv-04485Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, Case No. 24-4485 v. KEITH PRYER et al, Defendants. MEMORANDUM COSTELLO, J. March 23, 2026 Plaintiff Ohio Security Insurance Company (“OSIC”) sued Defendants Keith Pryer, Keith Pryer, LLC, and Niambi Lumpkin Pryer, seeking a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify the Defendants in three underlying actions in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. The Defendants have failed to respond or otherwise participate in this action. OSIC obtained an entry of default…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Robin Chamberlain v. Vincent C. Giampapa, M.D., Individually and Dba Plastic Surgery Center InternationaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. O'CONNOR v. Sandy Lane Hotel Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Lloyd Z. Remick, Esq. v. Angel Manfredy John Manfredy Jeffrey H. Brown, Esq. Kathleen H. Klaus, Esq. D'AnconA & PflaumCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API