Legal Opinion

Gay v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 6, 1983No. 39681PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Presiding Justice.

In this case, a husband and wife were killed in an automobile collision; the husband died approximately one and one-half hours after the wife had died. The Court of Appeals held that, under the Georgia Motor Vehicle Accident Reparations Act, the estate of the husband was not entitled to recover survivor’s PIP benefits under the wife’s automobile insurance policy. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gay, 165 Ga. App. 293 (299 SE2d 611) (1983). For the reasons given in the Court of Appeals’ opinion, we agree.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Gregory, J., not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. GayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Polson v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API