Legal Opinion

B. C. Napier Company v. Feltner

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 12, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Reversing.

In this suit on a promissory note brought by appellee against the appellants a demurrer was sustained to the appellants’ original answer. . Thereafter they filed an amended answer. A demurrer was sustained to this amended answer, and, on motion, it was ordered stricken from the files. Judgment was thereupon entered on the petition and the appellants bring this appeal. The only question we have to determine concerns the sufficiency of this amended answer. It pleads that the note sued on herein “was procured and obtained by the plaintiff, W. R.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Evans v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882
  2. Davidson v. FallsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  3. Brenard Manufacturing Company v. RaffelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Worden v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Columbia Restaurant v. SadnovickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Cummings v. Delph's CommitteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API