Legal Opinion

Home Indemnity Co. v. Daniels Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 4, 1969No. 3 Div. 362PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

Daniels Construction Company was the prime contractor for the construction of Gayfer’s Springdale addition in Mobile, Gayfer’s being a department store. On July 26, 1965, Daniels entered into a subcontract with R. E. Box, d/b/a R. E. Box Com struction Company, under which subcon-: tract Box agreed to perform certain work' on the Gayfer’s job. The Home Indemnity Company issued a subcontract1'.labor and material payment bond with Daniels as obligee, Box as principal, and Home Indemnity as surety. This bond wás dated August 27, 1965, and included the following provisions:

“NOW…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Baltimore, Md. v. RainerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. United States v. Blount Brothers Construction Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1958
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Kemp Smith Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barge & Co. v. Oakwood Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Berlin Steel Construction Co. v. Salah & Pecci Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API