Legal Opinion

Cisco & N. E. Ry. Co. v. McCharen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 1938No. 1809PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FUNDERBURK, Justice.

Roy McCharen recovered judgment below against Cisco & Northeastern Railway Company for damages in the sum of $2,750, from which the latter has appealed.

The appellant, defendant below, will be referred to as defendant, and appellee, the plaintiff below, as plaintiff, the same as in the trial court.-

The cause of action involved a personal injury of plaintiff at the crossing of the railroad and a public street in the city of Breckenridge, which latter was also a part of three or four state highways.

Plaintiff’s petition alleged grounds of negligence denominated (a) to (p),…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. PriceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. I. G.N.R.R. Co. v. EdwardsTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. GaddisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  4. Wichita Valley Ry. Co. v. FiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Harris v. Thornton's Department StoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fort Worth & D. Ry. Co. v. BarlowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. International-Great Northern R. Co. v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. SwitzerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  4. DeBolt v. WallaceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  5. Wichita Falls & Southern R. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API