Legal Opinion

Loud v. The Doris Eckhoff

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 2, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The libel in this case was filed to recover damages arising from a collision in the East river, a few hundred feet below Corlear’s Hook, at about 10 a. m. on the morning of March 8, 1886, between the libelants’ schooner C. R. Flint, and the bark Doris Eckhoff. The Flint was going up river with a strong flood-tide, in tow of the steam-tug J. G. Stevens, upon a hawser of 40 fathoms. The bark was coming down the river, upon a hawser of about the same length, in tow of the tug R. S. Carter. The Stevens and the schooner were proceeding up river about one-third the distance across from the New York…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sturgis v. BoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. The" Virginia Ehrman" and The" Agnese"Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. The" Civilta" and The" Restless"Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. The Mabey and CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. The BelknapDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1873

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dowling v. Isthmian S.S. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. Atlas S. S. Co. v. The ChicagoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1896
  3. American S. S. Co. v. Hand & Johnson Tug LineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1927
  4. Shaver Transp. Co. v. Columbia Contract Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API