Legal Opinion
Curry v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 4, 1996No. 95-2122PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENGEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Donald Curry and Alma Ortiz appeal the district court’s judgment for the United States in their suit against the United States and Joe Roybal arising from an accident involving the plaintiffs and Roybal. The plaintiffs’ claim against the United States is based on the theory that Roybal was an employee of the United States Forest Service (“USFS”). The district court held that Roybal was not an employee of the USFS and entered final judgment for the United States. We affirm.
I
The accident occurred when the plaintiffs, husband and wife, were on a motorcycle on a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Logue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Raymond Lurch v. United States of America, Defendant-Third Party v. The Regents of the University of New Mexico and Ralph Kaplan, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Edward C. Becker, Administrator of the Estate of Ernest J. Becker, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Dean W. Lilly v. Paul R. Fieldstone, M.D., and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Duplan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Woodruff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Tsosie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Coffey v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Garcia v. ReedDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.