Black v. Wiedeman
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
STANLEY, Commissioner.
We have for review the adequacy of a fee allowed the appellant, William Si Black, .as guardian ad litem for infant defendants in litigation involving the estate of the late ,J. D. Purcell, particularly the construction •of his will and of three instruments of writing concerning six insurance policies for which he had contracted or had had issued to members of his family, including four named grandchildren. The nature and complexity of the case is reflected in First National Bank and Trust Co. of Lexington v. Purcell, Ky., 244 S.W.2d 458, 459, affirming a judgment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Axton v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
- Baxter v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Staggenborg v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Lexington v. PurcellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Morgan v. GetterKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- S.J.L.S. v. T.L.S.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2008
- Branham v. StewartKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Kentucky ex rel. Cabinet for Human Resources v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- James v. ShadoanKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.