Legal Opinion

Harvey v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 27, 2015No. S14A1646Published

1Opinion of the Court

296 Ga. 823

FINAL COPY S14A1646. HARVEY v. THE STATE. NAHMIAS, Justice. Appellant Kajul Harvey challenges the trial court’s denial of her plea in bar based on double jeopardy after her first trial for murder and other crimes ended in a mistrial. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that Appellant’s counsel violated the court’s pretrial ruling on a motion in limine and improperly referred to evidence that may well not be admissible when he referred to Appellant’s police interview during his opening statement, and the court also did not abuse its…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API