Legal Opinion

Weinstock v. Kallet

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 2, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

This action was instituted by two stockholders against the defendant corporation, 362 Riverside Drive Cooperative, Inc. and its officers and directors, to recover $1,250, 000 for alleged negligent, careless and imprudent management of the defendant corporation. The complaint - sets forth five causes of action, the first, second, third and fifth of which were dismissed by an order of this Court filed July 1, 1950. The fourth cause of action, alleging that the individual defendants negligently failed to obtain financing or re-financing to prepay outstanding mortgages,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Stewart v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Boesenberg v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  4. Johnson v. Riverland Levee Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  5. American Creosote Works, Inc. v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Selman v. ColbornDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  2. Bauer v. Servel, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  3. Dalva v. BaileyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  4. Zimmerman v. BellDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
  5. Himmelblau v. HaistDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API